In mathematics, a theorem is proved when they say: cvd (End of proof) ... and I think that this formula is the more apt the episode I am about to resume.
I had only spoken a few days ago, the Supreme Court had annulled the SME trial which condemned Cesare Previti's territorial jurisdiction for corruption prosecutor in Milan. According to the Supreme Court is the prosecutor in Perugia have to educate on the process, because it alone is competent to do so.
The decision of the Supreme Court did enjoy a certain political party, which received the same decision as a kind of absolution against Previti, a victim of persecution that the courts in Milan for years have put in place against it and therefore against Silvio Berlusconi, his most famous client (then) and his great friend.
Apart from the perversion of this belief that anyone who knows a minimum of law removing the bud (the Supreme Court does not judge the merits of the processes, but only the form, so the procedure by which they are trained and conducted), a look at the reasons for the ruling issued just to dispel any doubts that might arise again:
"According to the Supreme Court there were two recommendations localized uniquely and accurately Previti's house in Rome and Lazio at the rowing club, established by the heads Stefania Ariosto and related non-contact illocalizzabili, anticipating a subsequent deposit in the bank, but a direct delivery from the corrupt corrupter . The two episodes were the most relevant and proven concretization of donations in cash, the head of disputed charges .
That is, the Supreme Court said that the evidence against Previti and the other defendants are so clear, clear, documented, that these very characteristics make it possible to define without a doubt that the prosecutor in Milan has no jurisdiction on the matter, but is instead that of Perugia. Schifani Pace, Bondi, Cicchitto and all others who have gloated ...
The part in quotes is taken from Republic . it
0 comments:
Post a Comment